Chaingpt staking assigns tier points to locked CGPT under each pool's reward and lock terms

Token rewards and campaign allocations use different measurements

CGPT staking produces a points balance, while token payouts depend on a pool's reward terms or a separate campaign's allocation rules. A multiplier increases the weight of the stake within the points system. It does not express an annual return. APY includes compounding assumptions; a displayed annual percentage rate (APR) does not incorporate compounding in the same way. Neither label identifies the staking-point multiplier. A campaign distribution also has its own eligibility and release schedule, so its token allocation cannot automatically become the pool's annual yield.

The zero-yield pool design approved in August 2024 paired 0% APY with higher point multipliers. Its options included a six-month lock at 1.7× and a one-year lock at 2.2×. Those specifications explained a membership trade-off: more point weight for a longer commitment, without annual token yield. Older positive-yield pool descriptions concern different reward terms. Their percentages do not establish a current offer for every pool.

BNB Chain supplies the staking network and gas

ChainGPT Pad's CGPT staking pools use BNB Chain, and BNB pays the network fees for staking and unstaking transactions. CGPT supplies the stake; it does not replace the gas balance. The connected wallet must match the position that the application displays. ChainGPT applies regional restrictions to new CGPT stakes and blocks VPNs and proxies on its staking interface. Campaign participation can add identity verification and regional eligibility requirements beyond the pool's staking conditions. A recorded tier therefore does not resolve every access requirement for a token sale or reward claim.

Pool multipliers turn staked balances into tier points

CGPTsp means staking points, the accounting unit that connects a CGPT stake to tier-based benefits. Staking points equal the staked CGPT amount multiplied by the selected pool's point multiplier. The base relationship assigns one point to one staked CGPT before applying that multiplier. For stakes across multiple pools, the platform calculates each position separately and adds its points to the wallet's total. Multiplying the entire balance by the highest pool multiplier would overstate the points when other positions carry lower weights.

Lock duration alone does not identify every pool's point weight. The pool catalogue includes 45-day options with 1× and 1.1× multipliers, alongside 90-day options with 1.3× and 1.4× multipliers. These are distinct pool entries, not interchangeable descriptions of one position. Each pool's own terms govern its stake. Longer commitments generally receive higher multipliers, but the selected entry determines the actual weight and any reward terms.

Tier thresholds change access and allocation weight

ChainGPT Pad's tier schedule starts Bronze at 2,000 points, Silver at 20,000, Gold at 50,000, and Diamond at 200,000. These thresholds count points, rather than the market value of the deposited tokens. A balance below the Bronze threshold has no tier under that schedule. Tier benefits follow the applicable membership and campaign rules; crossing a threshold alone does not purchase a token allocation.

View image file

The allocation multiplier is a further measurement that a sale applies after determining the tier. It differs from the staking pool multiplier that created the points. Bronze has a fixed base allocation weight, while higher tiers can scale their weight with the point balance inside their tier range. The eventual allocation also reflects the campaign and other eligible participants. A higher tier can improve access or weighting without fixing a token quantity for every event. Governance uses its own eligibility and voting-weight rules when voting is enabled.

V2 migration preserves a position while deposits extend its lock

V2 staking distinguishes moving an existing position from adding CGPT to it, because those operations have different effects on the unlock time.

Migration moves a V1 position into the corresponding V2 pool. A successfully completed migration is intended to preserve the staked amount, unlock date, points, and tier, subject to normal calculations and other wallet activity. The migration setup can require one transaction or several steps, depending on the wallet, interface, and execution method.

V2 extends the unlock time by a stake-weighted amount when CGPT joins an existing stake. This replaces V1's full lock reset when adding tokens. The added amount influences the extension, so the original unlock date does not remain fixed after a top-up.

V2 updates staked balances and pool totals from on-chain state as deposits and withdrawals occur. Pool capacity affects whether another deposit can enter, alongside the selected pool's lock and point terms.

New pool and campaign registration requires migration from V1 under the V2 rollout rules. Migration itself does not enroll the wallet in a giveaway or establish a reward allocation. Any migration-related incentive retains its registration window, snapshot rules, and claiming conditions.

View image file

Locks limit withdrawals independently of reward claims

Locked CGPT remains unavailable for withdrawal until the position reaches its unlock time, including stakes created by mistake. Support cannot shorten that contractual lock. V2 permits reward claiming separately from principal withdrawal, so a reward claim does not unlock the stake. A longer commitment can increase point weight while preventing access to the principal for longer. During that interval, the token's market value can change even when its staked quantity remains the same. Smart contract failures can also put the locked CGPT at risk.

View image file

Sale formats apply staking weight at different times

Standard IDOs, or initial DEX offerings, use tier-based access, registration, and allocations announced before the buying window. Identity verification and the required tier precede participation. Registration timing matters because an eligible balance acquired after the campaign's cutoff may miss the allocation calculation. The pool multiplier establishes staking points; the sale's rules then determine how those points affect access and purchase limits.

Public Sales using the Subscription format accept eligible, identity-verified participants without requiring their own stake or a tier. Final allocations follow the sale's close and allocation calculation. Where a campaign enables a staking boost, it increases the effective commitment used for weighting. Campaign-specific limits and total eligible demand still affect the final share.

Tier-based fee discounts can provide another benefit where the campaign charges fees. Some Public Sales waive fees across tiers, so a higher tier does not always create additional fee savings. The relevant charge can apply to accepted allocation or an optional full refund. These sale fees are separate from staking transaction gas and any token yield.

Buzz rewards and token drops depend on campaign eligibility

Buzz v2 assigns campaign rewards across configurable activity buckets, including a Stakers bucket when the campaign enables it. Registered stakers share that bucket according to their eligible staking points relative to the bucket's total. Its share of the overall reward pool can vary, so the enabled campaign settings determine the applicable split.

Staking can also enable boosts for eligible Buzz activity. These apply to future points after activation, with the affected activities and multipliers set by the campaign. Staking points, Buzz activity points, and reward tokens remain separate units. Snapshot eligibility and integrity checks precede allocation, while the token generation event and vesting schedule govern claiming.

Launchdrops provide another use for a staked tier: eligible, identity-verified members can receive distributions without purchasing in an IDO. Related IDO giveaways can require participation in the corresponding sale and exclude participants who request refunds. Their conditions do not apply automatically to every drop. A qualifying tier establishes only the point-based part of eligibility; each distribution still has its own allocation and release conditions.

Delegation, rentals, and AI credits create separate benefits

Point delegation allows a wallet to assign usable staking points to another wallet, affecting the recipient's tier. Received delegated points cannot be delegated onward. The documented rules block delegation, revocation, or deletion when either wallet has already participated in an active IDO pool. A pool is active after buying starts until it fills or its sale ends. Delegating points concerns membership weight, not withdrawal of the locked CGPT.

The Staking Points Marketplace lets stakers rent out eligible points for an agreed period while their CGPT remains in its pool. After activation, those points count for the renter instead of the lender until the agreed rental end time. Rental payments are separate from any staking-token rewards. The documented split sends 70% to the lender, 20% to the platform treasury, and 10% to CGPT buy-and-burn. Network gas fees are separate. The stake must remain locked through the rental's end, and campaign rules decide which rented-point benefits apply. Listing points alone does not reduce the lender's tier; the usable balance changes after settlement reaches blockchain finality and the platform processes the rental. Processing delays do not extend the rental's agreed end time.

Staking-based Freemium membership connects points to AI usage allowances. Its qualification description requires more than 200,000 CGPTsp and provides a monthly balance top-up to 20,000 CGPTc. CGPTc are usage credits, distinct from CGPT tokens and staking points. They can support tools such as the Smart Contract Generator, Smart Contract Auditor, and AI NFT Generator. Pay-as-you-go credit purchases provide another access choice without a staking lock.